Rating the Finns - Part II

A war weary Model 75A. The white rings indicate repaired bullet holes.

In a previous post I discussed my thoughts about the low aircrew quality ratings given to the Finns in the Battles Above 4 scenario book. This is not a post to disparage the author of that excellent scenario book in any way, but it is simply my thoughts on how I think the Finns should be rated in terms of Aircrew quality.

I have now gathered several titles on the Finns, in some cases titles in which the author(s) have sourced Soviet records to compare reported losses, and this research has convinced me that the Finns did have some of the highest kill ratios of any nation during World War II, usually flying outdated aircraft, and more often than not outnumbered in the various encounters with the Soviets.

What I first thought was an anomaly, that being the overwhelming kill ratio of Lentolaivue 24, flying Brewster F2As before receiving Messerschmitt Bf 109Gs later in the war, was not the exception, but instead the exceptional example of multiple successful Finnish squadrons. As outlined in another post, Lentolaivue 32, flying the Curtiss Model 75As for three years, also had an impressive kill ratio. But it does not stop there. With Morane-Saulnier 406s and Fiat G.50s other squadrons also inflicted far more casualties on the Soviets than was received in return. So we need to address the question - how were the Finns able to have such success?

"It's the man, not the machine" - and while I mostly agree with this premise, the tools of war can often provide an edge, but not so with the Finns. With aircraft of comparable performance in many cases, with armament on the lighter side, and with machines that were typically no more robust than the enemy, the Finns made up for a lack of quality equipment by the superior quality of their pilots. However, as mentioned in the previous post, the scenarios in Battles Above 4 do not give much distinction in aircrew quality between the Finns and the Soviets. While I usually like the aircrew ratings found in the Battle Above series, and the methodology that the author uses to determine ace and veteran aircrew quality, I believe that same methodology does not "work" during the Continuation War. How do we address this?

I have a few ideas around aircrew ratings for the Finns. The first takes an approach that any Finnish pilot that has five or more kills is an ace (+3). This is different than Battles Above, in which the author uses twenty kills or more before applying ace status. I would make a Finnish pilot with one to four kills a veteran (+2) aircrew, and any other pilot who has zero kills is rated as skilled (+1). Green (+0) aircrews should be extremely rare for the Finns. By taking this approach and applying against the scenarios in Battles Above 4, it will make most Finnish aircrew ratings improve, if one knows what pilots were involved in each scenario. As most of the scenarios only have a pilot or two named, this process would not ideally work, although any green aircrew would be bumped to skilled regardless, at least in my mind.

Another approach is to lower the aircrew ratings for each Soviets by one level, and utilizing the poor (-1) aircrew rating offered in the Korean War scenario book for green pilots, green for skilled, and so on. This potentially would balance the scenarios more towards the Finns, which makes sense to me, as in most of the scenarios they are outnumbered. This might be the easiest adjustment that can be made based on historical performance and the lack of information when it comes to knowing which Finnish pilots were present for each scenario.

A more extreme approach is to use both the aforementioned methods. Based on kill ratios, this actually might result in more historical outcomes but less than ideal balance for the Soviet players. However, in most of the scenarios the Soviet have the numerical advantage. Of course, being a dice game, results can always vary widely game to game so it would take several playthroughs of one scenario to see if any of the methods above provide a more historical outcome.

Here is a look at all three methods, using one scenario from Battles Above 4 in which the Finns are outnumbered. This scenario (65 to 0) had on the Finnish side the following known pilots and the number of confirmed kills each had obtained before this engagement - Aulis Bremer (6.33), Eino Koskinen (7.5), Kalevi Tervo (6.0), Pauli Salminen (3), and Yrjö Pallasvuo (5). 

Using my suggestions for Finnish aircrew quality above, giving ace status to these pilots with  five or more kills, really shows the imbalance, particularly if increasing the Finns and decreasing the Soviets. However, the historical event played out with the Finns claiming eleven kills (there were also present, but not in the scenario, Soviet bombers) to zero losses. The alternate version of this fight (Finland's Hawks, Stalin's Falcons) has the Finns at a greater numerical disadvantage with eighteen Soviet fighters and six Soviet bombers. I cannot imagine playing out this scenario and seeing the Finns so outnumbered and still managing to inflict such losses on the Soviets without making, at the very minimum, a dramatic increase in the Finnish aircrew quality.

It will be interesting to play through the scenarios with some measure of adjustments in place...but first I need to collect and paint planes!